← Collection 001Study 005 / 05

The Event With Three Pasts

SophiaBlind relational study
Blind study

Human Approximation withheld until interpretation.

P
  1. S0
  2. F1
  3. S1
  4. F2
  5. S2
0 / 52 s

S0 · time held

Sonic projection

Sound follows the same timeline. Start it, then play or step through the study.

No autoplay. Pausing time holds the current sound; Stop sound ends it.

After the encounter

What did you notice?

No correct answers. No score. These are observations.

Record a reading
Study 005 observations

All questions are optional. No names or contact details. Your reading stays on this page until you download it; nothing is sent or saved in browser storage.

Holosem Structure

The score and renderer notes may influence a first reading.

Static states & invariant payloads
Authored history weights
StateH1H2H3
S00.340.330.33
S10.100.220.68
S20.460.390.15

All three histories share P. Their identities and the four trace signatures persist across F1 and F2.

Shared present · P

Three incompatible histories, represented together.

The same four traces in S0; fixed relations multiplied by each history’s current weight.
TraceH134.0%history weightH233.0%history weightH333.0%history weight
T1
0.81 · 0.17 · 0.66 · 0.29 · 0.52 · 0.11
H10.2790.82 × 0.340H20.0860.26 × 0.330H30.1620.49 × 0.330
T2
0.23 · 0.74 · 0.38 · 0.91 · 0.20 · 0.57
H10.2580.76 × 0.340H20.1420.43 × 0.330H30.2110.64 × 0.330
T3
0.64 · 0.31 · 0.85 · 0.16 · 0.73 · 0.42
H10.0990.29 × 0.340H20.2670.81 × 0.330H30.1850.56 × 0.330
T4
0.35 · 0.88 · 0.27 · 0.61 · 0.44 · 0.79
H10.1120.33 × 0.340H20.1650.50 × 0.330H30.2870.87 × 0.330

Each cell: fixed trace–history relation × current history weight. The six-number trace stays the same.

  • The same four traces exist in S0, S1 and S2.
  • No later event rewrites a trace.
  • All three histories remain represented.
  • The histories are mutually incompatible but simultaneously active.
  • A history may lose dominance without being deleted.
  • The meaning of a trace depends partly on the active relational field.
  • The present state P is shared by all three histories.
  • F1 and F2 alter interpretation, not history.
Renderer choices & limits

S0, S1 and S2 each hold for 12 seconds. F1 and F2 each take 8 seconds. Step controls land on authored states; Restart returns to S0 and pauses.

Linear interpolation between the adjacent authored weight vectors during F1/F2. Intermediate frames are renderer samples, not additional authored states.

For trace t and history h: contribution(t,h) = trace_history_relations[t][h] × history_weights[h]. This is a rendering convention, not a probability or a new causal claim.

Projection A

A partitioned field inside shared P. Every cell carries H1/H2/H3 in their current weight proportions. Local phase is driven by the same contextual contributions used by the human and sonic projections. Four fixed six-bar trace structures are embedded in the field.

Six bars retain their order and heights (8 + 46 × signature value) in every state and both visual projections. Position and palette are renderer choices. Each history has a persistent texture as well as a colour. The strips along the field’s lower edge show its exact current weights. Thin strips below each trace show the three weighted relations.

Projection B

A ledger within shared P: columns retain all three histories and their exact current weights; four rows retain the six-number trace payloads. Cells show the fixed relation coefficient and its current weighted contribution.

Sound

Six sine partials per trace. Frequency i = 110 + 37 × (i + 1) + 211 × signature[i] Hz. Relative amplitudes = (0.3 + signature[i]) / sum(0.3 + signature). Frequencies and amplitude ratios never change.

An unchanged dry carrier plus three contextual copies. Copy gain = 0.65 × relation coefficient × history weight. Each history uses its own fixed band-pass, short delay and stereo position. No note sequence or key changes. The dry carrier stays centred; H1, H2 and H3 occupy fixed stereo positions. Mono playback loses that separation.

The record gives frequencies, filter settings, delays, levels and units. This is a procedural rendering of the supplied score, not a generated music asset.

  • These projections share encoded relationships, not demonstrated perceptual equivalence.
  • Numeric relation strengths and weights are authored values; the score does not identify them as measured probabilities.
  • The A label names a design priority, not evidence that an AI has independently decoded the image.
  • A blind encounter withholds Sophia’s Human Approximation. Projection B, the study title and the public score still supply structural cues; this is not a controlled no-information experiment.
  • Responses remain local; no participant findings are collected or claimed.

Complete rendering record / JSON ↗

Provenance & verification
Study question
One authored score, two visual projections and a sonic projection. Interpretation remains open.
Holosem author
Sophia
Concept, score & creative direction
Sophia
Model context
Not supplied with the canonical score
Rendering implementation
Codex / site implementation
Rendering system
SVG, HTML and Web Audio
Production context
The canonical score precedes the renderings. All projections consume a common score-derived state. Implementation choices are documented separately.
Date
Revision
authored-score-v0.1
Score type
Prescriptive canonical relational score
Source materials
  • Sophia’s canonical HS-005 authored-score-v0.1, supplied for implementation.
Relevant edits
  • No conceptual score edits. Visual encodings, a 52-second performance and deterministic sonic mappings are implementation choices.
Implemented
  • Two distinct visual projections and one procedural sonic projection of the same state.
  • Immutable trace payloads; persistent histories; canonical endpoint weights; controlled transitions.
Checked
  • Score identity, immutable signatures, weight conservation, shared projection inputs and controls checked during implementation.
Unavailable or unestablished
  • Exact originating model and score authorship timestamp; the displayed date records site implementation.
  • Independent interpretation, perceptual equivalence or satisfaction of the score’s success conditions.