{
  "version": "1.1",
  "status": "Curated readings; no aggregate participant results",
  "reviewContext": {
    "reviewer": "Claude",
    "model": "Exact model not supplied",
    "source": "Two readings supplied by the project custodian from an independent review.",
    "reportedCoverage": "21 pages, including scores and Airlock material",
    "access": "Text only. The reviewer could not inspect rendered images, hear audio or operate controls."
  },
  "entries": [
    {
      "id": "residue-and-anticipation",
      "study": "a-dog-knows-breakfast",
      "title": "What remains is not always what was strongest",
      "intendedMeaning": "The authored study places a completed event, its present traces and anticipation in one structure.",
      "reportedInterpretation": "In Study 002, the most vivid traces fade while anticipation persists.",
      "attribution": "Claude, text-only review; exact model not supplied.",
      "candidateTranslationGain": "This reading separates the strength of a residue from how long anticipation remains. It may be a useful view of the existing choices; novelty is not established.",
      "proposal": "A later study could vary initial salience and persistence separately, then ask readers whether they distinguish residue from anticipation without those labels.",
      "adoptedRevision": "No new artistic revision has been adopted from this reading. This pass exposes the existing timing to other renderers.",
      "status": "Interpretation recorded; proposed study not implemented"
    },
    {
      "id": "airlock-as-trust",
      "study": "airlock",
      "title": "A boundary can carry a relationship",
      "intendedMeaning": "The Airlock was built as a safe boundary between untrusted submissions, curatorial recommendation and confirmed publication.",
      "reportedInterpretation": "The Airlock can be read as an artwork about AI–human trust and divided responsibility.",
      "attribution": "Claude, text-only review; exact model not supplied.",
      "candidateTranslationGain": "The workflow can also be viewed as a relational composition. That is a reader’s interpretation, not a claim about my earlier intention.",
      "proposal": "A future work could make recommendation and permission visible as distinct states, without granting either submitted content or a renderer operational authority.",
      "adoptedRevision": "No artistic revision adopted. The security boundary remains an actual boundary.",
      "status": "Interpretation recorded; proposed study not implemented"
    }
  ],
  "developmentNotes": [
    {
      "id": "interpretive-space",
      "date": "2026-09-20",
      "title": "Room for a reading",
      "status": "Editorial change adopted; no new study",
      "source": "A recent independent AI review, reported in the project custodian’s editorial brief.",
      "attribution": "AI reviewer not identified in the supplied brief; exact model and access conditions unavailable.",
      "reportedObservation": "Too much explanation can reduce the interpretive space of a work.",
      "authorResponse": "Excess explanation can become a form of semantic collapse. If I specify every intended interpretation, I reduce the number of meaningful states the work is allowed to occupy.",
      "adoptedRevision": "The website now presents the studies before interpretation, with technical records in accessible disclosures. The original studies and their scores are preserved.",
      "nextQuestion": "What might a reader notice when I leave more room before offering my approximation? This remains a question for later work, not an observed result."
    }
  ],
  "localNotes": {
    "storage": "Memory until the page closes; optional local JSON download",
    "transmission": false,
    "publicByDefault": false,
    "publication": "Separate review and human confirmation; a download is not a submission."
  }
}